초록
우리나라의 동력경운기(動力耕耘機)에 탑재(搭載)된 6.0 및 7.5kW의 수냉식(水冷式) 4행정(行程) 디젤기관(機關)의 성능향상(性能向上), 중량경감(重量經減), 생산비(生産費) 절감(節減)을 도모하고, 기관(機關) 설계시(設計時) 고려(考慮)할 수 있는 기본자료(基本資料)를 얻기 위(爲)하여 동력경효기 탑재용(搭載用) 기관(機關)의 부품중(部品中) 플라이 휠의 중량(重量)만을 32.2, 29.7, 26.2, $24.2kg_f$ 등(等)의 4수준(水準)으로 감소(減少)시켜, 출력(出力), 토크, 연료(燃料) 소비율(消費率), Motoring loss, 진동량(振動量) 등(等)을 측정(測定) 분석(分析)한 결과(結果)를 요약(要約)하면 다음과 같다. 1. O사(社)의 소프트웨어에 의한 설계(設計)로 7.5kW 기관(機關)의 플라이휠의 최적중량(最適重量)은 $23.7kg_f$이었으며, 생산업체(生産業體)의 설계기준(設計基準)을 고려(考慮)하였을 경우 플라이휠 최적중량(最適重量)은 $24.51kg_f$으로서 두 경우 모두 현재(現在)의 플라이휠 중량(重量) $32.2kg_f$보다는 적은 것으로 나타났다. 2. 플라이휠의 중량(重量)이 $32.2kg_f$일 때 6.0kW기관(機關)의 경우 정격출력(定格出力)은 7.43kW, 7.5kW 기관(機關)의 경우에는 7.85kW이었으며, 플라이휠 중량(重量)을 $24.2kg_f$으로 감소(減少)시켰을 때 6.0kW 기관(機關)은 7.70kW로 0.27kW의 정격출력(定格出力)이 증가(增加)되었고 7.5kW 기관(機關)은 7.85kW에서 8.25kW로 0.39kW의 정격출력(定格出力)이 증가(增加)되었다. 3. 플라이휠중량(重量)이 $32.2kg_f$에서 $24.2kg_f$으로 감소(減少)되었을 때 연료소비율(燃料消費率)은 6.0kW 기관(機關)의 경우 약(約) 4.0g/kW-h만큼 감소(減少)되었으며, 7.5kW기관(機關)에서는 약(約) 0.8g/kW-h가 감소(減少)되였다. 4. 플라이휠 중량(重量)이 $32.2kg_f$에서 $24.4kg_f$으로 감소(減少)시킴에 따라 진동량(振動量)은 6.0kW와 7.5kW 두 기관(機關) 모두 크게 증가(增加)하는 경향(傾向)이었다. 5. Motoring loss는 플라이휠 중량(重量)을 $32.2kg_f$에서 $24.2kg_f$으로 감소(減少) 시켰을경우 2200rpm에서 6.0kW 기관(機關)은 2.33kW에서 1.76kW로 감소(減少)하였고 7.5kW에서는 2.46kW에서 1.84kW로 감소(減少)하였다. 6. 기관(機關)의 기계효율(機械效率)은 플라이휠의 중량(重量)을 $32.2kg_f$에서 $24.4kg_f$으로 감소(減少)시켰을때 6.0kW 기관(機關)은 76.1%에서 76.8%로 0.7%가 7.5kW 기관(機關)은 76.68%에서 77.02%로 0.34%가 증가(增加)하였다.
Most of small size diesel engines are widely used with the same size and weight flywheel in the levels of 6.0kW and 7.5kW. This study was conducted to obtain basic data which affect the engine performance of the power tiller. The flywheel weight was considered as a major factor in this research. Basically, fuel consumption ratio, motoring loss, torque, vibration and mechanical efficiency of the engine were measured and analyzed on four levels of flywheel weight, 32.2, 29.4, 26.2 and $24.2kg_f$, respectively. Results were obtained as follows: 1. The weights of flywheel were $23.7kg_f$ from design program of JSME and $24.5kg_f$ from ASME and SAE design criteria. Therefore, the flywheel weight of $32.2kg_f$ might be reduced about $8kg_f$ in 7.5kW engine. 2. The rated outputs of 6.0kW and 7.5kW engine were actually 7.43kW and 7.85kW, respectively. When flywheel weight was reduced from $32.2kg_f$ to $24.2kg_f$, outputs were increased from 7.43kW to 7.70kW in 6.0kW engine and from 7.85kW to 8.25kW in 7.5kW engine. 3. When the flywheel weight was reduced from $32.2kg_f$ to $24.2kg_f$, fuel consumption ratio was decreased from 300.8 to 296.8g/kW-hr in 6.0kW engine and also from 313.6 to 312.8g/kW-hr in 7.5 kW engine, respectively. 4. When the flywheel weight was reduced from $32.2kg_f$ to $24.2kg_f$, mechanical efficiency of engine was increased from 76.1% to 76.8% in 6.0kW engine and also from 76.7% to 77.0% in 7.5kW engine, respectively. 5. When the flywheel weight was reduced from $32.2kg_f$ to $24.2kg_f$, vibration was decreased at X-axis and Z-axis in 6.0kW engine, however, slightly increased at Y-axis in 6.0kW engine and at all axes in 7.5kW engine. 6. When the flywheel weight was reduced from $32.2kg_f$ to $24.4kg_f$ motoring loss was decreased from 2.33kW to 1.75kW in 6.0kW engine and also from 2.46kW to 1.84kW in 7.5kW engine.