Influence of Coated Urea Complex Fertilizer Application on Growth and Grain Quality of Paddy Rice

피복요소복합비료(被覆尿素複合肥料)의 시용방법(施用方法)이 벼 생육(生育)과 미질(米質)에 미치는 영향(影響)

  • Published : 1993.06.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate coated urea complex fertilizer (CUC) application for rice growth and its grain quality on clay loam (Deogpyeong series) and sandy loam (Gangseo series) in southern region of Korea, 1992. The coated urea complex fertilizer used in the experiment was CUC I and II. The CUC I is a complex fertilizer consisting of 18-12-13 for $N-P_2O_5-K_2O$ including 50% of coated urea as nitrogen source, and CUC II is the same complex fertilize as mentioned above but it contains 25% of coated urea. Seventy percent of conventional fertilizer for nitrogen level was applied as basal dose of side-band placement (SBP) and whole plowlayer placement (WPP). Greenish degree of rice leaf color at the late growth stage was high in CUC plots regardless of application method and soil series. Amount of nitrogen uptaken by the rice plant at harvesting stage was mush more in the CUC treatment compared to convential fertilizer, and also much more in CUC I than that of CUC II. In the WPP on clay loam, harvest index of CUC treatment was showed very low level, which was reduced more in CUC II plot. In the CUC treatments, perfect rice grain ratio decreased remarkably, and the notched-belly rice kernel ratios among imperfect rice grain increased drastically. In rice grain, Hon-value(Mg to K.N ratio) decreased, protein and amylose contents increased in CUC application plots in WPP. In addition, gel consitency and alkali spreading value related to eating quality in CUC plots were getting longer and lower, respectively. The yield in CUC plot was similar to conventional fertilizing, but significant decreased in SBP. As a result, the rice grain quality became poor with the coated urea complex fertilizer application, but it could be improved by incorporation with fast-release fertilizer.

피복요소복합비료(被覆尿素複合肥料) 시용과 벼 생육(生育) 및 미질(米質)과의 관련성을 밝히기 위하여 벼 측조시비용인 피복요소복합비료(18-12-13)를 공시하여, 피복요소복합비료 전량처리구(CUC I)와 피복요소복합비료 50%와 속효성비료 50% 혼합처리구 (CUC II)로 식양토(埴壤土)(덕평통(德坪統))와 사양토(砂壤土)(강서통(江西統))에서 검토한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 벼 잎색도(色度)는 전층(全層)시비와 측조(側條)시비 모두 토성(土性)에 관계 없이 벼 생육후기(生育後期)에는 피복요소복합비료시용구에서 높았다. 2. 질소흡수량(窒素吸收量)은 관행에 비하여 피복요소복합비료 시용구에서 많았고, 피복요소복합비료 II시용구보다 피복요소복합비료 I시용구에서 많았다. 3. 수확지수(收穫指數)는 피복요소복합비료 시용구에서 낮았고, 속효성 비료 혼합시용에 의해 그 정도를 줄일 수 있었다. 4. 피복요소복합비료시용은 완전미율(完全米率)이 감소(減少)되었고, 불완전미중(不完全米中)의 동할미율(胴割米率)이 현저히 증가되었으며, 미립중(米粒中)의 Hon치(値)(Mg/K.N)는 감소된 반면, 단백질(蛋白質), amylose 함량은 증가 되었다. 5. 취반특성(炊飯特性)인 호응집성(糊凝集性)(gel consistency)과 알칼리 붕괴도(崩壞度)(asv)는 피복요소복합비료시용에 의해 각각 길어지고, 낮아졌다. 6. 이상의 결과에서 미질(米質)은 피복요소복합비료 시용에 의해 나빠지는 경향이었고, 속효성비료(速效性肥料) 혼합(混合)시용에 의해 어느 정도 방지(防止)할 수 있었다.

Keywords