A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY OF PARENTS WITH AND WITHOUT CLEFT LIP AND/OR PALATE CHILDREN

순열ㆍ구개열 환자 부모와 정상 성인의 두개안면 형태에 관한 비교 연구

  • Lim Sug-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Koh Kwang-Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 임숙영 (전북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 고광준 (전북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학교실)
  • Published : 1993.06.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether any difference existed in craniofacial morphology between parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate and parents of children without cleft lip and/or palate as well as the characteristics of craniofacial morphology in parents of children with cleft lip and/or palate. Thirty three measurements of the various regions of cranium and face were obtained from lateral cephalometric radiograms in parents of 28 children with cleft lip and palate, 18 children with cleft lip, and 22 children with cleft palate. There were 28 couples and 40 single parents in this sample. There were 92 individuals including 41 males and 51 females. The measurements were compared with those in control subjects, including 40 adult males and 40 adult females, who had no history of craniofacial abnormalities. The total sample was compared for the sex independently. The obtained results were as follows. 1. In the cranium, both parents of cleft children had significantly shorter posterior cranial base length(S-Ba). 2. In the upper face, a significantly shorter anteroposterior length of maxilla(A'-Ptm'), particularly in the anterior region (A'-K), anterior facial depth(A-SBaL), posterior facia! height(Ptm'-SNL) and relation of subnasale to the cranial base (∠BaN'Sn) were noted in fathers of cleft children. But, all measurements were not found to be significantly different between experimental group and control group in all mothers. 3. In the lower face, both parents of cleft children showed a significantly greater Y axis angle(∠NSGn) and ramal plane angle(∠SNL-RP) in fathers of cleft children. Thus both patents showed a posteriorly rotation of mandible. The thickness of the lower lip(B-B') was significantly thicker in fathers of cleft children. 4. In the facial profile, a significantly shorter posterior facial height(S-Go) and greater angle of soft tissue facial convexity (∠BaN'Pog') were noted in the fathers of cleft children. But, all measurements were not found to be significantly different between experimental group and control group in all mothers.

Keywords