Korean Journal of Head & Neck Oncology (대한두경부종양학회지)
- Volume 8 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.31-36
- /
- 1992
- /
- 1229-5183(pISSN)
- /
- 2586-2553(eISSN)
A Clinical Observation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Neck Mass
경부 종류의 세침 흡인 세포학적 검사에 대한 임상적 고찰
- Lim Jong-Hak (Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang College of Medicine) ;
- Kim Jae-Jun (Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang College of Medicine) ;
- Lee Dong-Hwa (Department of Pathology, Soonchunhyang College of Medicine) ;
- Hur Kyung-Bal (Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang College of Medicine)
- 임종학 (순천향대학교 의과대학 외과학교실) ;
- 김재준 (순천향대학교 의과대학 외과학교실) ;
- 이동화 (순천향대학교 의과대학 해부병리학교실) ;
- 허경발 (순천향대학교 의과대학 외과학교실)
- Published : 1992.06.01
Abstract
Neck mass is common neoplasms, but it poses a diagnostic dilemma for the physician. The differential diagnosis include neoplastic, inflammatory and developmental causes. The FNAC is one of the most valuable tests in the initial assessment and differential diagnosis of the neck mass. FNAC was performed with 267 cases of the neck mass, during the period from April, 1988 to October, 1990 at the department of General Surgery, Soon Chun Hyang. University Hospital. Thyroid lesions were excluded from this analysis. Final diagnosis was based on resection histology in 58 cases, and surgical specimens were compared with FNAC. The following results were obtoired ; 1) Of 267 cases, there we re 9 cases(3.4%) of congenital lesion, 74 cases(27.7%) of inflammatory lesion, 40 cases(15.0%) of benign tumor, 12 cases(4.5%) of primary malignant tumor, 37 cases(13.8%) of metastatic tumor, 75cases(28.1%) of reactive hyperplasia, 20 cases(7.5%) of unsatisfactory. In the pathologic classification, inflammatory lesion was the most common. 2) In the 58 cases of excisional biopsy, sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 95.2%, false positive 11.8%, false negative 2.4%, positive predictive value 88.2%, negative predictive value 97.6%, accuracy 94.8%. 3) The most common disease was the tuberculous lymphadenitis (53 cases, 19.8%). sensitivity 57.9%, specificity 100.0%, false positive 0.0%, false negative 17.0%, positive predictive value 100.0%, negative predictive value 83.0%, accuracy 86.2%.
Keywords