A STUDY ON THE BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN-RETAINED PROTHESIS WITH VARIOUS CAST RETAINER DESIGNS

주조체의 설계 변화에 따른 수지접착형 보철물의 접착강도에 관한 연구

  • Joo Dae-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang Ik-Tae (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim Kwang-Nam (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 주대원 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 장익태 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실) ;
  • 김광남 (서울대학교 치과대학 치과보철학 교실)
  • Published : 1992.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of some resistance form designs on the bond strength of resin-retained prosthesis. Six sub-groups are designed in natural teeth group and resin teeth group . The framework designs in natural teeth group: 1) no groove preparation 2) groove at the center of distal surface 3) groove at the distobuccal line angle 4) 45 degree lateral load with no groove 5) 45 degree lateral load with center groove 6) splint two teeth with no groove. The framework designs in resin teeth group: 1) no groove preparation 2) groove at the center of distal surface 3) groove at the distobuccal line angle 4) metal covered the 1/2 of distal surface 5) metal covered the 1/2 of mesial surface 6) metal extended over the 114 of buccal surface. Specimens were treated electrolytic etching by Oxy-Etch and cemented with Panavia EX. Failure load was measured by Instron. Another 30 specimens were carried out fatigue tests by MTS 810 fatigue testing machine for 5000 cycles at different load level. The following results were obtained from this study. 1. The failure load was significantly increased by resistance forms. 2. The failure load was not increased by increase of total surface area bonded with teeth. The distal surface area played an important role in failure load. 3. In 45 degree lateral load group, the failure load was decreased significantly than that of in vertical load group. 4. Bond failure modes between static test and fatigue test exhibited no differences.

Keywords