Detection of antibodies against infectious Borna disease virus -a comparison of three serological methods-

보르나병 바이러스 항체검출을 위한 연구 -세 가지 혈청진단법의 비교-

To determin the accuracy of serological methods in detecting Borna-disease(BD) viral antibodies, 273 experimentally infected rabbit sera were compared by using indirect immunofluorescence antibody test(IFA), serum neutralization test(SN) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA). One hundred twenty-three serum samples had BD viral antibodies detected by IFA. CELISA antibodies to BD virus were also present in the same one hundred twenty-three serum samples. However, neutralization test antibodies to BD virus were present in 27 of the in rabbit serum samples. Neutralization test was sensitive in comparison with KFA and CELISA. In comparison with IFA, CELISA was both sensitive and specific in detecting BD viral antibodies. These results extend observations made with laboratory animals to the diagnosis of naturally infected animals.

Borna disease(BD) virus 특이항체검출에 대한 세 가지 혈청진단법(간접형광항체법, 세포효소면역반응법, 혈청중화시험)의 정확도를 비교하기 위해 BD virus를 실험적으로 감염시킨 273수의 토끼의 혈청으로 시험하였다. 혈청중 간접형광항체법에 의하여 판정된 123혈청들은 모두 세포효소면역반응법에 의해서 양성으로 판정되었으나 혈청중화시험법에 의해서는 단지 27혈청에서만 양성으로 판정되었다. 혈청중화시험법은 간접형광항체법과 세포효소면역반응법에 비하여 민감도가 훨씬 낮게 나타나 BD virus의 혈청학적 연구에는 간접형광항체법 및 세포효소면역반응법의 활용도가 높을 것으로 생각된다.