EFFECTS OF PROPLAST I AND II IMPLANTATION ON THE SURROUNDING TISSUE RESPONSE AND BONE FORMATION IN RABBIT MANDIBLE

가토 하악골에 Proplast I과 II 이식후 주위 조직반응 및 골형성

  • Ryu, Sun-Youl (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Geon-Jung (Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 류선열 (전남대학교 치과대학 구강 악안면 외과학 교실) ;
  • 김건중 (전남대학교 치과대학 구강 악안면 외과학 교실)
  • Published : 1991.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the response of adjacent tissue and new bone formation after implantation by different methods of subperiosteal using using Proplast I and II in rabbit mandible. Microstructure of Proplast I and II was observed by scanning electron microscope. And the implantation procedure was carried out by dividing into tow groups, A and B. a group consisted of subperiosteal graft on the cortex, and the other B group was made up onlay graft following artificial decortication in the madibular body of rabbit. The experimental animals were sacrificed on the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 8th week after grafting for macroscopic and histopathologic examination. The samples extracted at the 6th postgrafting week were also used for biometric test. The result ere as follows : 1. By scanning electron microscopic observation, pore size was $50{\sim}180{\mu}m$ in the Proplast I and $100{\sim}220{\mu}m$ in Proplast II. 2. Macroscopically, infection of the graft site, deformation and displacement of the implanted materials were not observed in all experimental groups. 3. In the tissue response, infiltration of inflammatory cells and multinucleated giant cells were observed from the 2nd to the 8th week in Proplast I. Inflammatory cells decreased in number from the 2nd week in Proplast II suggesting that Proplast II is better than Proplast I. 4. Bone formation was not observed until the 8th week in the group A, but new bone formation from the surrounding graft bed and the periostium was appeared from the 4th week in the group B. 5. The maximum mean values of shear stress mere serially $65.5gf/mm^2$ in Proplast II of group B, $32.9gf/mm^2$ in Proplast I of group B, $17.0gf/mm^2$ in Proplast II of group A, and $15.7gf/mm^2$ in Proplast I. of group A.

Keywords