A comparison of the shear bond strength between porcelain repair systems and fractured surface of porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations

도재파절 양상에 따른 수종의 도재 수복용 레진의 결합력에 관한 실험적 연구

  • Choi, Jeung Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Dong Hoo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 최정원 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 한동후 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 1990.12.01

Abstract

Although dental porcelain demonstrates lasting esthetic results, it suffers from inherent brittle fractures. Various techniques and materials for intraoral porcelain repair has been suggested. This study investigated the in vitro shear strength of three porcelain repair systems according to aspects of the porcelain fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems(All-bond, Clearfil, Scotchprime) according to fractured surface of porcelain - fused - to - metal restorations. For this study specimens were divided into five groups : group 1 represented fracture occurred at body porcelain layer, group 2 represented fracture occurred at opaque porcelain layer, group 3 represented fracture including 1/3 of metal exposure, group 4 represented fracture including 2/3 of metal exposure, and group 5 represented all metal surface was exposed. Specimens were stored in double deionized water(24Hr, $37^{\circ}C$) and thermocycling was performed(24Hr, 1080cycles), and subjected to a shear force parallel to the repair resin and porcelain interface by use of an University Testing Machine. The results of this study were obtained as follows : 1. In group 1 and 2, bond strength was relatively high, and bond strength showing reducing tendency as exposure of metal was increased. 2. In group 1, bond strength was relatively high, and no significant differences in porcelain repair system. 3. In group 2, 3 and 4, All-bond and Clearfil provided significantly higher bond strength than scotchprime. 4. In group 5, bond strength was the lowest among all groups and especially in case if Scotchprime. 5. Cohesive failure was observed in group 1 and 2, adhesive failure was observed in group 5, and cohesive / adhesive failures were observed in group 3 and 4.

Keywords