TOMOGRAPHIC AND CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY OF CONDYLAR POSITION IN TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDER PATIENTS

악관절 기능장애 환자의 하악과두 위치에 관한 단층 및 두부방사선 계측학적 연구

The author analysed tomographic and cephalometric radiographs of 82 temporomandibular joints from 41 symptomatic patients and 40 temporomandibular joints from 20 asymptomatic young adults. The results were as follows; 1. The mean condylar angulation in control group and patient group was 21.72±6.48° 20.13±9.14° respectively and there was no significant difference between two groups. 2. The mean depth of cut was 6.63±0.38㎝ in control group and 6.57±0.46㎝ in patient group. 3. Mean height and width of condylar head were 6.66±1.83㎜, 12.42±0.49㎜ in control group and 6.22±1.36㎜, 11.93±l.92㎜ in patient group. 4. The mean height of articular fossa was 10.20±2.04㎜ in control group and 9.89±1.98㎜ in patient group. The mean width of articular fossa was 21.08±2.08㎜ in control group and 21.24±3.03㎜ in patient group. 5. In centric occlusion the superior joint space was largest (4.15±0.93㎜), followed by the posterior joint space (2.99±0.97㎜) and the anterior joint space (2.70±0.73㎜) in control group. The superior joint space (3.47±1.31㎜) and posterior joint space (3.47±7.07㎜) were same in patient group. There was significant difference in left superior joint spaces between two groups (p<0.05). 6. The condylar position in articular fossa was displaced anteroinferiorly (0.99±3.65㎜ anteriorly, 1.75±1.01㎜ inferiorly) in control group and posteroinferiorly (3.20±4.69㎜ posteriorly, 1.25±1.87㎜ inferiorly) in patient group with 1 inch opening. In maximum opening, it was displaced anteroinferiorly (6.09±3.55㎜ anteriorly, 1.38±2.47㎜ inferiorly) in control group and anteroinferiorly (1.70±5.96㎜ anteriorly, 1.37±1.85㎜ inferiorly) in patient group. There was significant difference in anteroposterior position of both condyles with 1 inch opening and maximum opening between two groups (p<0.01). 7. The mean inclination of upper central incisor and the posterior inclination of articular eminence in control group was 65.60±6.04° 58.88±9.18° in control group, and 67.14±8.41°, 59.70±9.08° in patient group respectively. There was no significant correlation between two groups.