Effects of Cyclophosphamide on Immunological Memory in Mice

Cyclophosphamide가 마우스의 면역기억에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Young-Min (Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Park, Yoon-Kyu (Department of Medical Science, Chonbuk National University Graduate School) ;
  • Ahn, Woo-Sup (Department of Medical Science, Chonbuk National University Graduate School) ;
  • Ha, Tai-You (Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
  • 박영민 (전북대학교 의과대학 미생물학교실) ;
  • 박윤규 (전북대학교 대학원 의학과) ;
  • 안우섭 (전북대학교 대학원 의학과) ;
  • 하대유 (전북대학교 의과대학 미생물학교실)
  • Published : 1987.06.30

Abstract

The use of alkylating agent cyclophosphamide(CY), a widely used antitumor drug is well known as a potent immunosuppressant and has been used as a probe for investigating the functional capabilities of lymphocyte subsets of both T and B cells that play an important role in the regulation of the immune response. The present study was undertaken in an effort to assess the effects of CY on immunological memory in murine model. CY, given as a single dose of CY(250mg/kg) before sensitization with sheep red blood cells(SRBC) enhanced the primary response of Arthus and delayed-type hypersensitivity(DTH), as measured by footpad swelling reaction, but suppressed their tertiary DTH response. The similar CY pretreatment enhanced both the primary and tertiary hemagglutinin(HA) responses to SRBC, and the tertiary antibody response against polyvinylpyrroridone(PVP), a thymus-independent antigen but not the primary response against PVP. CY, given as a single dose of 250mg/kg 2 days before the primary immunization and two doses of 100mg/kg 2 days before the secondary and tertiary immunization, markedly suppressed the tertiary DTH and HA responses to SRBC. However, CY, given as small multiple daily doses(10mg/kg) over 4 days before sensitization but not after sensitization, enhanced the secondary HA response to SRBC. Contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene(DNFB) was suppressed by the drug, given either as a single large dose(300mg/kg) or as multiple dose(10mg/kg) administered 2 days before, together with or after DNFB sensitization. This suppression was more pronounced and more significant when CY was given as multiple dose. However, the enhancement of the secondary contact sensitivity to DNFB by CY was not clear-cut. The splenectomy appears to increase the enhancing effect of CY on contact sensitivity. These results suggest that CY selectively influences the immune response depending on the time of the drug administration relative to immunization and that the secondary or tertiary immune response involve memory cells with different susceptibilities to CY. Moreover, these results suggest that multiple low doses may sesectivley inhibit suppressor T cell proliferation involving DTH, HA or contact sensitivity without effecting helper T cells, but high doses presumably inhibit helper T cells and suppressor T cells with effecting B cells.

Keywords