Chemical Characteristics and Efficacy of Combined Pesticide Granules Formulated by Different Ways

제제방법별(製劑方法別) 혼합입제(混合粒劑) 농약(農藥)의 특성(特性)과 약효(藥效)

  • Oh, B.Y. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Y.S. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Shim, J.W. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kang, C.S. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, H.R. (Agricultural Chemicals Research Institute, Rural Development Administration)
  • 오병열 (농촌진흥청 농약연구소) ;
  • 박영선 (농촌진흥청 농약연구소) ;
  • 심재완 (농촌진흥청 농약연구소) ;
  • 강창식 (농촌진흥청 농약연구소) ;
  • 이형래 (농촌진흥청 농약연구소)
  • Published : 1986.03.30

Abstract

A comparative study of chemical characteristics, efficacy and relative merits of extruded and coated granules, containing fungicide and insecticide, was conducted under laboratory and field conditions. Probenzole (3-allyloxy-1,2-benzisothiazole 1,1-dioxide) and carbofuran (2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7-benzofuranyl methyl carbamate) were chosen as toxicants for rice blast(Pyricularia oryzae) and brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) control, respectively. Stability of active ingredients in coated granule was superior to the extruded one under accelerated temperature. Active ingredient dissolution of coated one into distilled water showed slow release pattern. Pesticide residues in rice (Oryzae sativa, Chucheongbyeo) shoot applied with extruded one at the dosage of 3kg/10a retained higher levels than those with coated one on two days after application, while the residue levels were a reversed tendency on eight days after application. Efficacy on rice blast exhibited minute differences between the granules, on the other hand efficacy on brown planthopper by coated one was of higher rank than that by extruded one. Production cost of the combined pesticide granule by coating method could be cut down by 6% as compared to extrusion method.

입제농약(粒劑農藥)의 제제방법(製劑方法)에 따른 화학적(化學的) 특성(特性)과 병해충 방제효과를 비교(比較)하기 위하여 습식법(濕式法)과 피복법(被覆法)으로 제조(製造)한 probenazole + carbofuran(6%+3%)입제(粒劑)를 공시약제供試藥劑)로 하여 실내(室內) 및 포장시험(圃場試驗)을 실시(實施)하였던바 다음과 같은 결과(結果)를 얻었다. 1. 피복법(被覆法)에 의한 입제(粒劑)는 습식법(濕式法)에 의한 입제(粒劑)보다 주성분(主成分)의 경시안정성(經時安定性)이 양호(良好)하였으며 수중(水中) 주성분(主成分) 용출속도(溶出速度)도 완만(緩慢)하였다. 2. 약제처리초기(藥劑處理初期)의 추청(秋晴)벼 지상부중(地上部中) 농약잔류(農藥殘留) 농도(濃度)는 습동법(濕東法)에 의한 입제(粒劑)가 피복법(被覆法)에서 보다 높게 유지(維持)되었으나, 약제처리(藥劑處理) 8일후(日後)에는 반대(反對)의 경향(傾向)을 나타냈다. 3. 도열병(稻熱病)의 방제효과는 입제(粒劑)의 제제방법조간(製劑方法間)에 큰 차이(差異)가 없었으나, 벼멸구의 방제효과는 피복법(被覆法)에 의한 입제(粒劑)가 우수(優秀)하였다. 4. 피복법(被覆法)에 의한 probenazole+carbofuran 입제(粒劑)의 생산비(生産費)는 습식법(濕式法)의 경우(境遇)보다 약(約) 6%의 절감(節減) 효과가 있었다.

Keywords