Experimental studies on the characteristics of the mortar using dispersing agent of cement and high fluid admxiture

시멘트 분산제(分産劑) 및 고류동화제(高流動化劑)를 사용(使用)한 모르터의 제(諸) 성질(性質)에 관(關)한 실험적(實驗的) 연구(硏究)

This study was the contrast of the compressive strength, the tensile strength, the reducing ratio and the flow of mortar using dispersing agent and high fluid admix. 1. The admix ratio of chemical admixtures espressing maximum strength appeared the same result high fluid admix SP was 0.6%, the dispersing agents LG and C211 were 0.2%, SK was 0.3%, C376 was 0.5%. But two or three times more than standard quantity made the strength's fast lowness, which influenced bad to wateriness and retard the soli-dification. 2. When proper quantity of chemical admixture was used, the increment of compressive strength was as follows. High fluid admix SP was 40.7% and the average increasing rate of dispersing agents(C211 was 19.5%, LG was 19.1%, C376 was 17.9%) was 18.7% more than normal mortar in the codition of 7 days. Also, in the condition of 28 days, high fluid admix SP was about 24.4% and the average of dispersing agents(LG was 21.1%, C211 was 16.4%, SK was 11.1%, C376 was 7.6%) was 14.1%. 3. When proper quantity of chemical admixture was used, the increment of tensile strength was as follows. High fluid admixture SP was 26.6% and the average increasing agents(SK was 16.0%, C376 was 14.7%, LG was 10%, C211 was 5.8%) was 11.6%. Also, in the condition of 28 days, high fluid admix SP was 16.5% and the average increasing rate of dispersing agents(LG was 19.1%, SK was 10.6%, C211 was 10.1%, C376 was 8.7%) was 12.1%. 4. As for the reducing ratio of each dispersing agent, he flow of mortar was less than the slump of concrete. That is; the reducing ratio of concrete was 15% adding each dispersing agent, but the reducing ratio of mortar was in the range of from 5.8% to 13.5% in 1 : 1 mixture, from 7.6% to 14.2% in 1 : 2, from 9.5% to 18.8% in 1 : 3. 5. The fluidity of each chemical admixture was as follows. High fluid admix SP in the condition of 1: 1 and 1 : 2 showed the best result than other dispersing agent and 1 : 3 showed the same result like other agents. Therefore these good dispersing agents were suitable in the prepact concrete construction using intrusion mortar.

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 시멘트 분산제(分散劑) 및 고유동화제(高流動化劑)를 사용(使用)하여 모르터의 압축(壓縮) 및 인장강도(引張强度)와 감소율(減少率), 흐름시험(試驗)을 실시(實施)하였으며 그 결과(結果)를 요약(要約)하면 다음과 같다. 1. 최대강도(最大强度)를 나타내는 이화제(泥和劑)의 최적(最適) 첨가율(添加率)은 배합별(配合別) 공(共)히 같은 경향(傾向)으로 고유동화제(高流動化劑) SP는 0.6%이고 분산제(分散劑) LG와 C211은 0.2%, SK는 0.3%, C376은 0.5%로 나타났다. 그런데 사용적량(使用適量)의 2~3배(倍) 과다(過多) 사용시(使用時)는 강도(强度)가 급격(急激)히 저하(低下)하는데 이것은 수화작용(水和作用)에 악영향(惡影響)을 일으켜 응결(凝結)이 상당히 지연(遲延)되는 것으로 본다. 2. 적정량(適定量)의 이화제(泥和劑)를 첨가(添加)하였을 때 압축강도(壓縮强度)는 보통(普通)모르터 보다 재령(材令) 7일(日)에서 고유동화제(高流動化劑) SP는 40.7%, 분산제(分散劑)(C211은 19.5%, LG은 19.1%, SK는 18.1%, C376은 17.9%)의 평균(平均) 증가율(增加率)은 18.7%이었으며, 재령(材令)28일(日)에서는 고유동화제(高流動化劑) SP가 24.4%, 분산제(分散劑)(LG은 21.2%, C211은 16.4%, SK는 11.1%, C376은 7.6%)의 평균(平均) 증가율(增加率)은 14.1%로 나타냈다. 3. 적정량(適定量)의 이화제(泥和劑)를 첨가(添加)하였을 때 인장강도(引張强度)는 보통(普通)모르터 보다 재령(材令)7일(日)에서 고유동화제(高流動化劑) SP가 26.6%, 분산제(分散劑)(SK는 16.0%, C376은 14.7%, LG은 10.0%, C211은 5.8%)의 평균(平均) 증가율(增加率)은 11.6%이었다. 재령(材令)28일(日)에서는 고유동화제(高流動化劑) SP는 16.5%, 분산제(分散劑)(LG는 19.1%, SK는 10.6%, C211은 10.1%, C376은 8.7%)의 평균(平均) 증가율(增加率)은 12.1% 이었다. 4. 각각(各各)의 이화제(泥和劑)를 적량(適量) 첨가(添加)했을 때 모르터의 감수율(減水率)은 콘크리트의 감수율(減水率) 보다 작게 나온다. 즉 콘크리트의 감수율(減水率)은 15% 정도(程度) 감수(減水)했다고 했으나 모르터의 감수율(減水率)은 1 : 1의 경우는 최소(最少) 5.8%에서 최대(最大) 13.1%였고, 1 : 2의 경우는 최소(最小) 7.6%에서 최대(最大) 14.2%였으며, 1 : 3의 경우는 최소(最小) 9.5%에서 최대(最大) 18.8%의 범위(範圍)에 있었다. 5. 각(各) 이화제(泥和劑)의 유동성(流動性)은 고유동화제(高流動化劑) SP가 다른 분산제(分散劑) 보다 월등히 좋았다. 즉 1 : 1의 경우 w/c가 30%에서 280(75% 증가(增加)), 1 : 2의 경우는 w/c 가 36%에서 147(23.5% 증가(增加))로 가장 좋았으며, 1 : 3의 경우에서는 다른 분산제(分散劑)와 같은 경향(傾向)을 보였다. 그러므로 이러한 양질(良質)의 분산제(分散劑)는 프리팩트 콘크리트 공사(工事)에 사용(使用)하는 주입전충용(注入塡充用) 모르터에 적합(適合)한 것으로 사료(思料)된다.