The Korean Journal of Pharmacology (대한약리학회지)

The Korean Society of Pharmacology (대한약리학회)
권호 표지

Clinical Observation of Cefoperazone in Urinary Tract Infections

요로 감염증에 대한 Cefoperazone(Cefobid)의 임상효과

  • Yoon Moon-Soo (Department of Urology, Catholic Medical College) ;
  • Cho Dai-Haing (Department of Urology, Catholic Medical College) ;
  • Choi Baik-Nam (Department of Urology, Catholic Medical College) ;
  • Kang Shin-Tai (Department of Urology, Catholic Medical College) ;
  • Bang Jin-Sung (Department of Urology, Catholic Medical College) ;
  • Lim Soo-Kil (Department of Urology, Catholic Medical College) ;
  • Lim Jung-Kyoo (Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine Seoul, National University)
  • 윤문수 (가톨릭의과대학 비뇨기과학교실) ;
  • 조대행 (가톨릭의과대학 비뇨기과학교실) ;
  • 최백남 (가톨릭의과대학 비뇨기과학교실) ;
  • 강신태 (가톨릭의과대학 비뇨기과학교실) ;
  • 방진성 (가톨릭의과대학 비뇨기과학교실) ;
  • 임수길 (가톨릭의과대학 비뇨기과학교실) ;
  • 임정규 (서울대학교 의과대학 약리학교실)
  • Published : 1980.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The effectiveness of Cefoperazone in the treatment of urinary tract infection was evaluated in the Department of Urology, St. Mary's hospital from December 1. 1979 to April 30. 1980. In this studies, the cusative organisms were divided into 2 groups; 1) Single form. E. coli (8), Staphylococcus aureus(7), Proteus vulgaris (4), P. morganii(3), S. epidermis (1), Enterococcus(1), Klebsiella (2), N. gonococcus(1). 2) Mixed from: Proteus+E. coli(4), E. coli+other(1), Pseudomonas+Enterococcus(1), Klebsiella+other(1). Effectiveness on urological diseases. 1) Neurogenic bladder: Results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 4 cases and negative effect in 4 cases. 2) Non-gonococcal urethritis: In this group, the therapeutic results were favorable in 88.9% of all cases. (Excellent in 2, Fail in1) 3) Pyelonephritis: All(4 cases) were excellent. 4) Renal stone: Among the 4 cases of renal stone, only one case was responded to cefoperazone. 5) Two cases of urethral stricture, two cases of cystitis, one case of B.P.H. and one case of gonococcal urethritis were all excellent. No serious side effects were observed except slight dizziness in one case.

Keywords