Laboratory Tests for the Applicability of Various Testing Devices for Measuring Degree of Compaction

여러가지 다짐 평가장비의 적용성을 위한 실내시험

  • Yoo, Wan-Kyu (Dept. of Civil & Environmental Eng., Myongji University) ;
  • Lim, Nam-Gyu (Dept. of Civil & Environmental Eng., Myongji University) ;
  • Kim, Byoung-Il (Dept. of Civil & Environmental Eng., Myongji University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Hyong (Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • 유완규 (명지대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 임남규 (명지대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 김병일 (명지대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 김주형 (한국건설기술연구원)
  • Published : 2008.03.28

Abstract

Quality assurance for embankment compaction is one of very important procedures to guarantee high quality construction. However, only sand replacement method (KS F2312) and static plate load test (KS F2310) which are conventional and tiresome methods are used to evaluate degree of compaction at construction fields. Recently, new types of devices such as the geogauge and the light falling weight deflectometer (LFWD), the soil impact hammer (CASPFOL) and dynamic cone penetration test etc. which are able to substitute for the conventional methods are begun to use to evaluate soil stiffness. In this study, a laboratory model test was performed to evaluate correlations among test results obtained from the new devices and to assess the potential use of them. All test results have correlations with relative density and water content. Especially, the coefficients of correlation between $E_G$ from the geogauge and $K_{30'}$ from the soil impact hammer and between $E_G$ from the geogauge and $E_{LFWD}$ from LFWD are more than 0.7 but those between the results from DCP and others are less than those between $E_{G{\cdot}}$ and $K_{30'}$ and $E_G$ and $E_{LFWD}$.

Keywords