Board Level Reliability Evaluation for Package on Package

Factor : Structure Metal pad & SMO size Board level TC test : - Large SMO size better Board level Drop test : - Large SMO size better Factor : Structure Substrate thickness Board level TC test : - Thick substrate better Board level Drop test : - Substrate thickness is not a significant factor for drop test Factor : Material Solder alloy Board level TC test : - Not so big differences over Pb-free solder and NiAu, OSP finish Board level Drop test : - Ni/Au+SAC105, CuOSP+LF35 are better Factor : Material Pad finish Board level TC test : - NiAu/NiAu is best Board livel Drop test : - CuOSP is best Factor : Material Underfill Board level TC test - Several underfills (reworkable) are passed TCG x500 cycles Board level Drop test : - Underfill lots have better performance than non-underfill lots Factor : Process Multiple reflow Board level TC test : - Multiple reflow is not a significant actor for TC test Board level Drop test : N/A Factor : Process Peak temp Board level TC test : - Higher peak temperature is worse than STD Board level Drop test : N/A Factor : Process Stack method Board level TC test : - No big difference between pre-stack and SMT stack Board level Drop test : - Flux dipping is better than paste dipping but failure rate is more faster