DETECTION AND MASKING OF CLOUD CONTAMINATION IN HIGH-RESOLUTION SST IMAGERY: A PRACTICAL AND EFFECTIVE METHOD FOR AUTOMATION

  • Hu, Chuanmin (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Muller-Karger, Frank (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Murch, Brock (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Myhre, Douglas (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Taylor, Judd (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Luerssen, Remy (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Moses, Christopher (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing, College of Marine Science, University of South Florida) ;
  • Zhang, Caiyun (Department of Oceanography, College of Oceanography and Environmental Sciences, Xiamen University)
  • Published : 2006.11.02

Abstract

Coarse resolution (9 - 50 km pixels) Sea Surface Temperature satellite data are frequently considered adequate for open ocean research. However, coastal regions, including coral reef, estuarine and mesoscale upwelling regions require high-resolution (1-km pixel) SST data. The AVHRR SST data often suffer from navigation errors of several kilometres and still require manual navigation adjustments. The second serious problem is faulty and ineffective cloud-detection algorithms used operationally; many of these are based on radiance thresholds and moving window tests. With these methods, increasing sensitivity leads to masking of valid pixels. These errors lead to significant cold pixel biases and hamper image compositing, anomaly detection, and time-series analysis. Here, after manual navigation of over 40,000 AVHRR images, we implemented a new cloud filter that differs from other published methods. The filter first compares a pixel value with a climatological value built from the historical database, and then tests it against a time-based median value derived for that pixel from all satellite passes collected within ${\pm}3$ days. If the difference is larger than a predefined threshold, the pixel is flagged as cloud. We tested the method and compared to in situ SST from several shallow water buoys in the Florida Keys. Cloud statistics from all satellite sensors (AVHRR, MODIS) shows that a climatology filter with a $4^{\circ}C$ threshold and a median filter threshold of $2^{\circ}C$ are effective and accurate to filter clouds without masking good data. RMS difference between concurrent in situ and satellite SST data for the shallow waters (< 10 m bottom depth) is < $1^{\circ}C$, with only a small bias. The filter has been applied to the entire series of high-resolution SST data since1993 (including MODIS SST data since 2003), and a climatology is constructed to serve as the baseline to detect anomaly events.

Keywords